TCS Manager Manav Sharma Dies by Suicide: Family Alleges Harassment

In a tragic incident, 25-year-old TCS manager Manav Sharma was found dead in his home in Agra. Before taking his life, he recorded a heartbreaking video, detailing his distress and urging society to recognize the struggles faced by men. His family alleges that his wife’s harassment pushed him to this extreme step, while his wife denies the accusations, claiming he had addiction issues. The case is currently under police investigation.

Manav Sharma’s Final Video Message

Before ending his life, Manav recorded a six-minute, 57-second video where he spoke about his troubled marriage. In the video, he said:

• He was suffering emotionally due to his wife’s actions.
• His wife was allegedly involved with another man.
• He felt men’s struggles were ignored by society.
• He had attempted suicide before due to his distress.
• He apologized to his parents and urged society to talk about men’s issues.

His sister discovered the video on his phone two days after his death and informed the police.

Family Alleges Harassment

Manav’s father, retired Air Force officer Narendra Sharma, shared that his son had married on January 30, 2024. Initially, the marriage seemed fine, but problems quickly surfaced. According to the family:

• Manav faced threats of false accusations from his wife.
• His wife allegedly wanted to live with her boyfriend.
• The constant stress and fear pushed Manav to the edge.

Police Investigation Underway

Initially, no complaint was filed, but after receiving a WhatsApp complaint from Manav’s family, the police began investigating the case. They are looking into:

• The video evidence left by Manav.
• Allegations made by both sides.
• Any history of domestic disputes or violence.

Wife Denies Allegations

Manav’s wife, Nikita Sharma, released a counter-video denying the accusations. She stated:

• Manav had a history of alcohol addiction.
• He had attempted suicide multiple times before.
• He was physically abusive toward her.
• She had informed his family about his mental health issues but was ignored.

She also mentioned that she had warned his parents and sister about his condition before his suicide.

Also read | Best Tourist Spot In India – The Hidden Beauty Of Majuli

Who Was Manav Sharma?

Manav Sharma was a talented professional with a bright future ahead. According to his LinkedIn profile:

• He worked as a Senior Process Associate at Tata Consultancy Services (TCS).
• He was previously a Talent Acquisition Specialist at different firms.
• He graduated from DAV College, Chandigarh.
• He was passionate about his career and worked hard to achieve success.

His tragic end has sparked conversations about mental health and the need to address men’s emotional struggles.

Manav Sharma’s suicide has left many unanswered questions. His heartbreaking video has brought attention to the importance of recognizing men’s struggles in relationships and society. As the police continue their investigation, this case serves as a reminder that mental health issues and relationship challenges must be addressed with sensitivity and support.

For further updates on this case, stay tuned to Bharat Details.

The post TCS Manager Manav Sharma Dies by Suicide: Family Alleges Harassment appeared first on Bharat Details.

Farah Khan Holi Remark Sparks Controversy: Complaint Filed

What Happened?

Bollywood filmmaker and choreographer Farah Khan is at the center of controversy after making a remark about the festival of Holi. Popular social media personality Vikas Jayram Phatak, also known as Hindustani Bhau, has filed a complaint against her, claiming that her words were disrespectful and offensive to Hindu religious sentiments. The complaint was officially lodged at Khar Police Station in Mumbai.

Why the Complaint?

• Farah Khan allegedly called Holi a festival for “chhapris” during an episode of Celebrity MasterChef on February 20.
• Hindustani Bhau argues that her statement was offensive and could provoke communal tension.
• His legal representative, Ali Kaashif Khan Deshmukh, has urged the authorities to take legal action against her.

What Does the Complaint Say?

The complaint asserts that Farah Khan’s remark was deeply disrespectful and could incite unnecessary controversy. It demands action under various sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), including 196, 299, 302, and 353, which deal with offenses related to public order and religious harmony.

Police Response

So far, no First Information Report (FIR) has been registered. However, officials at Khar Police Station have confirmed that an inquiry is underway, and they are examining the complaint closely.

Who is Farah Khan?

• A celebrated Bollywood filmmaker and choreographer, Farah Khan has been a part of the film industry for decades.
• She is best known for choreographing iconic songs like Chaiyya Chaiyya and Ek Pal Ka Jeena.
• As a filmmaker, she has directed blockbuster films like Main Hoon Na, Om Shanti Om, and Happy New Year.
• She is currently a judge on Celebrity MasterChef, along with Vikas Khanna and Ranveer Brar.

Also read | Organizers Play Indian Anthem Before Australia vs England Match in Lahore

What’s Next?

Farah Khan has not yet issued a public statement regarding the controversy. It remains to be seen whether she will clarify her stance or if the matter will escalate further with police intervention.

Stay tuned to Bharat Details for the latest updates on this developing story.

The post Farah Khan Holi Remark Sparks Controversy: Complaint Filed appeared first on Bharat Details.

Supreme Court Issues Notice on Ashish Chanchlani’s Plea Over FIRs in Obscenity Case

In a major legal battle, popular YouTuber Ashish Chanchlani has approached the Supreme Court to quash or transfer multiple FIRs filed against him over allegations of promoting obscenity. The controversy stems from a YouTube show titled ‘India’s Got Latent,’ which has sparked legal trouble for several influencers.

The Supreme Court, on Friday, issued a notice to Assam and Maharashtra in response to Chanchlani’s plea, seeking clarity on the matter.

Why Did Ashish Chanchlani Approach the Supreme Court?

Chanchlani moved the Supreme Court requesting that the FIR registered in Assam be either quashed or transferred to Mumbai. His argument is that an earlier FIR was already registered in Mumbai, making it legally appropriate for all cases to be clubbed together.

Key Points from the Case:

• The FIR in Assam was filed at the Cyber Police Station, Guwahati Crime Branch.
• Chanchlani contends that the Mumbai FIR (filed earlier) should take precedence.
• The Supreme Court has now issued notices to Assam and Maharashtra, seeking their responses.

Who Else is Involved in the Case?

Apart from Ashish Chanchlani, other prominent influencers have also been named in the FIR, including:

• Ranveer Allahbadia (BeerBiceps) – Considered the primary accused for his remarks on the show.
• Samay Raina – Comedian and host of the show where the remarks were made.
• Jaspreet Singh – Stand-up comedian and guest on the episode.
• Apoorva Mukhija – Content creator involved in the discussion.

Legal Developments So Far

• The Gauhati High Court had earlier granted interim bail to Chanchlani, allowing him 10 days to appear before the investigating officer.
• Chanchlani’s legal team argues that he did not make any controversial statements during the show and was being wrongfully implicated.
• The Supreme Court has tagged Chanchlani’s plea with that of Ranveer Allahbadia, who is facing similar allegations.
• The court has sought a response from the government regarding the broader issue of obscenity in social media content.

SC’s Strong Remarks on Social Media Content

During the hearing, the Supreme Court expressed concerns about inappropriate content on social media platforms. Justice Surya Kant strongly condemned the remarks made during the show, stating:

“The words used in the show are shameful. Parents, daughters, and society at large will feel embarrassed listening to such conversations.”

The Court also questioned whether the government intended to regulate obscenity in online content and called for the Attorney General and Solicitor General to be present in the next hearing.

Also read | Ranveer Allahbadia Controversy: FIR Filed Over India’s Got Latent Episode

What Happens Next?

• The Supreme Court will continue hearing the case and decide on the transfer or quashing of FIRs.
• The legal teams of all involved influencers will present their arguments in the upcoming sessions.
• A government response on regulating social media content is expected soon.

This case has sparked a larger debate on content responsibility among YouTubers and influencers. While Chanchlani seeks relief from multiple FIRs, the Supreme Court’s strong stance hints at stricter regulations on online content in the near future.

The next hearing will likely set a precedent for content creators and digital media regulations in India. Stay tuned for updates on this developing story!

The post Supreme Court Issues Notice on Ashish Chanchlani’s Plea Over FIRs on Obscenity Charges appeared first on Bharat Details.

Maharashtra Government Takes a Stand

The issue caught the attention of Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis, who wasted no time in taking action. He immediately directed state police to contact Wikipedia and demand the removal of the disputed content.

Fadnavis made it clear:

• “I have instructed the Inspector General of Maharashtra Cyber Cell to engage with Wikipedia officials.”
• “We will not tolerate any misrepresentation of historical facts on public platforms.”
• “If the content is not removed, strict legal action will follow.”

Legal Battle Looms Over Wikipedia

In response, the Maharashtra Cyber Police officially issued a notice to Wikipedia, warning of legal consequences if the objectionable content was not taken down promptly.

Key concerns raised in the notice:

• The content was deemed “inciting communal hatred.”
• Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj holds deep cultural significance in India.
• Spreading misinformation could trigger social unrest.
• Wikipedia was urged to take immediate action to prevent further controversy.

The Freedom of Expression Dilemma

While Wikipedia is a globally accessible platform that allows public editing, Fadnavis stressed that freedom of expression must come with responsibility. He acknowledged the open nature of Wikipedia but insisted that history should not be twisted.

“Freedom of expression is not unlimited. It cannot infringe upon the rights and sentiments of others,” he stated firmly.

Public Outrage and Social Media Uproar

The controversy has sparked fiery debates on social media. Many users have expressed their frustration over the distortion of historical facts and are demanding stricter regulations to prevent such incidents.

Supporters of Sambhaji Maharaj argue that historical figures deserve accurate representation, while others question the feasibility of censoring publicly editable platforms like Wikipedia.

Also read | IPL 2025 Schedule, Venue and Players-list

What Happens Next?

As Wikipedia reviews the notice, all eyes are on how the platform will respond. Will they comply with the government’s demand and remove the content, or will they defend their open-editing policy?

One thing is certain—this debate is far from over. The Maharashtra government is determined to ensure historical authenticity, and the battle over Sambhaji Maharaj’s legacy continues to unfold.

Stay tuned for more updates on this explosive controversy!

The post Wikipedia Receives Notice Over Controversial Content on Sambhaji Maharaj appeared first on Bharat Details.

The Rise and Fall of Torres Jewellers

Torres Jewellers began offering investment schemes in February 2024, claiming substantial returns on purchases of moissanite stones and other jewellery products. According to reports, the company promised investors a weekly payout of 6% on their investments. Additionally, customers investing INR 1 lakh were offered a pendant with a moissanite stone valued at INR 10,000. However, it later came to light that these stones were fake and merely used as tokens to lure more investors.

The company presented itself as a lucrative investment opportunity, offering annual returns of 48% on gold purchases, 96% on silver investments, and a staggering 520% on moissanite purchases. Such returns attracted thousands of investors, many from lower-middle-class backgrounds, who trusted the scheme with their life savings.

How the Scam Fell Apart

As Christmas and New Year approached in late 2024, Torres Jewellers increased their payout rates from 6% to 13%, enticing even more people to invest. But by December 30, 2024, all payments stopped abruptly, and communication with the company ceased.

Investors began to panic when Torres showrooms shut down without any prior notice. Crowds of desperate investors gathered outside the Shivaji Park Police Station, seeking answers and assistance in recovering their money. Reports suggest that many individuals had convinced their friends and family to invest, amplifying the collective losses.

Who Are the Accused?

The authorities have arrested three individuals in connection with the scam: Sarvesh Ashok Surve, Tania alias Tazagul Karaxanovna Xasatova, and Valentina Ganesh Kumar. However, the alleged masterminds, Ukrainian nationals John Carter and Victoria Kowalenko, are believed to have fled India.

The Economic Offenses Wing (EOW) has launched an investigation under the Maharashtra Protection of Depositors Act and multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). An FIR has also been registered to formally address the scale and impact of the fraud.

Angry Investors Demand Answers

The bulk of Torres’ investors were small traders, vegetable sellers, and other lower-middle-class individuals. Many invested their hard-earned savings, ranging from a few thousand rupees to several crores, believing the scheme was backed by legitimate certifications, including GST and CIN numbers.

One distraught investor said, “We trusted Torres because they had GST and CIN numbers on their brochures. The government collected taxes from them, so why isn’t it helping us now?”

Another investor, who had deposited money just days before the shutdown, stated, “I won’t leave the Dadar office until I get my money back. This is our hard-earned money.”

The Company’s Defense: A Coup Allegation

Amid mounting outrage, Torres Jewellers posted a video on its official YouTube account, alleging internal sabotage. The video claimed that CEO Tausif Reyaz and Chief Analyst Abhishek Gupta orchestrated a coup, raided the stores, and robbed the company.

The footage reportedly shows people vandalizing stores, breaking jewellery cases, and looting cash. Torres maintains that CCTV footage has been handed over to the police as evidence of the coup.

The video further claimed, “Realizing that punishment was inevitable, Reyaz and Gupta organized this heist and implicated other employees in their crimes.”

Ongoing Police Investigation

Law enforcement agencies are actively investigating the Torres Jewellers fraud case, working to identify additional accomplices and piece together the full extent of the conspiracy.

Investors are anxiously seeking at least a return of their initial investments, but a resolution remains uncertain. Torres Jewellers has continued to shift the blame onto its CEO and select staff members. Reports indicate that the police have listed several individuals, including Platinum Hern, two directors, the CEO, a general manager, and a store in-charge, as key suspects in the case.

Also read How To Check SIM Cards Linked To Your Aadhaar Card: A Step-by-Step Guide

What Happens Next?

While investigations are ongoing, the aftermath of the scam has left thousands of families financially crippled. The Torres Jewellers scam serves as yet another grim reminder of the dangers of get-rich-quick schemes.

Authorities continue to gather evidence and record statements from affected investors. However, for many, the hope of recovering their hard-earned money remains slim.

The Torres case highlights the need for stronger regulatory oversight and public awareness to prevent such financial tragedies in the future. Until then, the victims of this multi-crore fraud await justice and restitution.

Mumbai Police arrest Director, two foreign nationals in Torres scam

The post The Torres Jewellers Scam: How a Multi-Crore Fraud Duped Over 1.25 Lakh Investors appeared first on Bharat Details.

Details of the Case

A senior police officer revealed that the three individuals have been charged with abetment of suicide under Section 108 of the Indian Penal Code, along with Section 3(5), which pertains to committing a criminal act with common intent. Reports suggest that the accused had allegedly demanded ₹3 crore to withdraw legal cases against Atul and ₹30 lakh for granting him visitation rights to see his son.

Investigation and Arrests

The Bengaluru Police sought assistance from their counterparts in Uttar Pradesh to trace the accused, as Nisha and Anurag had reportedly fled their Jaunpur residence on Wednesday. A notice was pasted on the wall of their locked house before their arrest. All three suspects were presented in court and sent to judicial custody.

Background of the Incident

Atul, who worked as a deputy general manager at an automobile company in Bengaluru, was found dead in his Munnekollal apartment on Monday. His death followed a complaint filed by his brother, Bikas Kumar, against Atul’s wife, Nikita, her mother Nisha, brother Anurag, and uncle Sushil Singhania.

The accused had applied for anticipatory bail in the Allahabad High Court, but the arrests occurred before the plea could be heard.

Allegations and Evidence

Before his death, Atul shared his struggles in a 24-page note and an 81-minute video. In the video, he wore a board around his neck that read, “Justice is Due.” He accused his in-laws of harassment and claimed that a family court judge in Uttar Pradesh had shown favoritism towards them, allegedly involving corruption.

Who Was Atul Subhash?

Originally from Uttar Pradesh, Atul married Nikita, a software professional, in 2019. The couple later separated, and Atul faced nine legal cases, including accusations of murder, dowry harassment, and unnatural sexual acts. His parents were also implicated in some of these cases.

The case has shed light on the alleged misuse of legal provisions and the personal toll of prolonged legal battles, sparking discussions about mental health and justice in family disputes.

Custody Battle for Subhash’s Son

Amid the ongoing investigation and arrests in the tragic case of Atul Subhash, his family is now grappling with another challenge — the custody of his young son, whose whereabouts remain unknown. Atul’s father, Pawan Kumar, has made an emotional appeal to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar, and other leaders for assistance in locating the child.

“We have no idea where Nikita has kept our grandson. Is he alive, or has something happened to him? We are completely in the dark. For a grandfather, his grandson is even more precious than his own son,” Pawan Kumar said in a statement. He also revealed that a fresh maintenance case has been filed against him in the child’s name, further adding to the family’s concerns, according to ANI reports.

Family’s Concerns

Atul’s brother, Bikas Kumar Modi, echoed similar worries, stating, “Our biggest fear is not knowing where my nephew is. We are hopeful that the remaining accused will also be apprehended soon, and we can get some answers.”

Also read 18-Year-Old Gukesh Dommaraju Becomes Youngest World Chess Champion

Broader Implications

This case highlights the deep emotional and legal complexities surrounding custody battles and marital disputes. Atul’s tragic death has not only devastated his family but also raised critical questions about the legal framework governing alimony, child custody, and the potential misuse of legal provisions in matrimonial conflicts.

As the case continues, it serves as a stark reminder of the need for legal reforms and systemic changes to address the emotional and financial toll such disputes take on families.

The post Bengaluru Suicide Case: Atul Subhash’s Wife, Her Mother, and Her Brother Arrested appeared first on Bharat Details.

The Controversy Explained (850 crore notice)

The Chhattisgarh Civil Society has challenged Navjot Singh Sidhu to substantiate his claim that his wife’s recovery from stage 4 cancer was achieved within 40 days by following a special diet.

What Did Navjot Singh Sidhu Say About the Diet and Cancer Treatment?

At a recent press conference in Amritsar, Navjot Singh Sidhu declared his wife cancer-free, crediting a special diet for her recovery. He explained the diet she followed during her treatment, saying it helped her recover from stage 4 cancer in just 40 days.

Sidhu also shared a video on Twitter, stating, “Treatment + Diet – Great combination for Cancer cure!”

In another post, he clarified that apart from the special diet, other treatments like chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, and targeted therapy also contributed to her recovery. He emphasized that it was a combination of all these treatments that helped her fight cancer.

The Special Diet Plan

Navjot Singh Sidhu shared the following items from the diet plan his wife followed:

1. Lemon water
2. Turmeric
3. Apple cider vinegar
4. Walnuts
5. Beetroot + Carrot + Amla juice

Additionally, she consumed neem leaves and completely avoided sugar and dairy products during her recovery.

Also read PAN Card 2.0: Features, Benefits & All About The QR Code On New PAN Cards

The ₹850 Crore Legal Notice

The Chhattisgarh Civil Society has demanded an apology from Navjot Singh Sidhu and has asked Navjot Kaur Sidhu to prove her recovery using the diet her husband claimed. They have given a seven-day deadline for her to respond. If they fail to provide proof, CCS may take legal action.

Navjot Singh Sidhu’s Clarification

In response to questions from an oncologist, Navjot Singh Sidhu clarified that the diet plan was followed under medical supervision. He said the diet was a supportive measure in her treatment.

In a video posted on Twitter, he said:
“I want to say that a doctor is like God to me, and doctors have always been my priority. I have a doctor (Navjot Kaur Sidhu) at home. The diet and treatment were done with the consultation of doctors.”

The post Navjot Singh Sidhu’s Wife Receives ₹850 Crore Notice Over Special Diet Cancer Treatment Claims appeared first on Bharat Details.